Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03233
Original file (BC 2014 03233.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 				DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03233

 							COUNSEL:  NONE

							HEARING DESIRED:  NO



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The Special Program Designator (SPD) code on her DD Form 214, 
Report of Separation from Active Duty, be corrected.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

She was given a separation code of SPD, which she believes 
describes the characterization of her separation as “        .”  
This is an untrue fact and is inappropriate to be documented on a 
DD Form 214.  She has sought to have this changed in the past but 
did not know how to do so.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 4 Mar 75, the applicant initially entered the Air Force 
Reserve.

On 12 May 75, a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) found the 
applicant unfit for duty because of physical disability and 
recommended she be discharged.

On 2 Jun 75, the Secretary of the Air Force approved the Physical 
Review Council’s recommendation the applicant be separated for 
physical disability.

On 22 Jun 75, the applicant was furnished an honorable discharge, 
with an SPD code of “JFM” (physical disability which existed prior 
to service, not entitled to severance pay), and was credited with 
3 months, and 19 days of active service.

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an 
error or an injustice.  The applicant incorrectly contends her 
separation code is SPD.  The acronym SPD stands for Special 
Program Designator and is not the actual separation code; the 
applicant’s separation code is JFM.  Further, JFM is not the code 
for “              ,” it is the code for “physical disability 
which existed prior to service, not entitled to severance pay.”  
Additionally, the reason for separation is also found in the 
remarks section of her DD Form 214.  Due to the fact the 
applicant’s SPD code is accurately displayed on her DD Form 214, 
block 9c, as JFM, no corrective action is recommended.

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 10 Oct 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D).  
As of this date, no response has been received by this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the 
applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no 
basis to recommend granting the requested relief.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly 
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 
BC-2014-03233 in Executive Session on 22 Apr 15 under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	 , Panel Chair
	 , Member
	 , Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 1 Aug 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 22 Sep 14.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Oct 14.

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00730

    Original file (BC 2014 00730.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00730 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Separation Program Designator (SPD) code be changed to SFJ – Permanent Disability Retirement. We do not believe the decision by the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) to grant the applicant service connection and disability compensation for her post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) establishes a basis for a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04794

    Original file (BC 2013 04794.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04794 COUNSEL: NONE INDICATED HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her disability retirement be changed to a retirement under the Temporary Early Retirement Authority (TERA). At the time of her separation, she should have received the same retirement benefit privileges as given to other service members that retired under TERA. On 30 Jun 94, the Secretary of the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02597

    Original file (BC 2014 02597.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02597 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation be changed to “Hardship” rather than “Pregnancy.” APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She elected to separate based on hardship due to domestic violence and not her pregnancy. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00612

    Original file (BC 2014 00612.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFBCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial of the applicant’s request to be granted a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) and removal of the personality disorder diagnosis. A complete copy of the AFBCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit D. AFBCMR Clinical Psychology Consultant recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice that incurred when the applicant was administratively discharged from the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04916

    Original file (BC-2012-04916.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04916 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reentry (RE) code of 2Q (Medically retired or discharged) and Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of JFM (Released for Conditions Existing Prior to Service) on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05662

    Original file (BC 2013 05662.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05662 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her service characterization, as reflected in Block 24 of her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed from “not applicable” to “honorable.” APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Reentry (RE) Code 2C gives her an “honorable” status, so it should be reflected in Block 24. The remaining...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02036

    Original file (BC 2014 02036.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02036 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, Block 28, Narrative Reason for Separation, be changed from “Personality Disorder” to “Bipolar Disorder” or similar mental illness condition. A complete copy of the BCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit E. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02996

    Original file (BC 2014 02996.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02996 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Separation Program Designator (SPD) Code of GHK (substandard performance) on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to GHF (Other). The applicant disagreed with the proposed action, and requested a Board of Inquiry (BOI) review her case. On 17 Sep 13, the applicant’s...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04646

    Original file (BC 2013 04646.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A complete copy of the AFBCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPSIRP recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change her name on the DD Form 214, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. However, after a thorough review of the evidence provided, we cannot conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01938

    Original file (BC 2014 01938.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01938 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The following be changed on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty: Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of “JKN;” Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of “2B;” and General under honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to Honorable. The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit...